Mobile Sempron M100 vs Celeron B830

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B830
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54
+145%
Mobile Sempron M100
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.22

Celeron B830 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28373189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency1.460.83
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Caspian (2009)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s3200 MHz
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988S
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX
FMA+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.54 0.22
Recency 1 September 2012 10 September 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron B830 has a 145.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The Celeron B830 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B830 and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B830
Celeron B830
AMD Mobile Sempron M100
Mobile Sempron M100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 89 votes

Rate Celeron B830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 8 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron M100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B830 or Mobile Sempron M100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.