Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Celeron B820

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B820
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.50
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
50.29
+9958%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Celeron B820 by a whopping 9958% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking287334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Power efficiency1.3517.00
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date1 July 2012 (12 years ago)7 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1729
L1 cache64K (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size131 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors504 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988,PGA988TR4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB256 GB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s102.403 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-
eDP+-
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+-
CRT+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B820 0.50
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 50.29
+9958%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B820 802
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 79889
+9861%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron B820 280
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 1622
+479%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron B820 492
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 14186
+2783%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 50.29
Recency 1 July 2012 7 February 2020
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

Celeron B820 has 700% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, on the other hand, has a 9958% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B820 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B820 and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 141 vote

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1118 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B820 or Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.