A6-9220C vs Celeron B800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B800
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
A6-9220C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.66
+57.1%

A6-9220C outperforms Celeron B800 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B800 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29742739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.1410.41
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B800 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1518
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size131 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors504 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B800 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCPGA988FT4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B800 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B800 and A6-9220C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B800 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B800 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B800 and A6-9220C integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B800 and A6-9220C.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B800 0.42
A6-9220C 0.66
+57.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B800 663
A6-9220C 1053
+58.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.66
Integrated graphics card 0.77 1.48
Recency 19 June 2011 7 January 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 6 Watt

A6-9220C has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, 92.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

The A6-9220C is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B800 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800
AMD A6-9220C
A6-9220C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 192 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 32 votes

Rate A6-9220C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B800 or A6-9220C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.