Athlon 64 LE-1640B vs Celeron 927UE

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Lima (2008−2009)
Release date1 January 2013 (11 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128K
L2 cache256 KB512K
L3 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data77 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistorsno data122 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAAM2
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron 927UE has a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 927UE is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 LE-1640B is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 927UE and Athlon 64 LE-1640B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 927UE
Celeron 927UE
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640B
Athlon 64 LE-1640B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 927UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 7 votes

Rate Athlon 64 LE-1640B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 927UE or Athlon 64 LE-1640B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.