Xeon E5-2699A v4 vs Celeron 867

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.24
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiencyno data10.54
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Broadwell-EP (2016)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)25 October 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134$4,938

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)22 (Docosa-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0QPI
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier1324
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB5.5 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)55 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors504 million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA1023FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt145 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+-
Demand Based Switching-+
PAEno data46 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size16 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1640

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 867 562
Xeon E5-2699A v4 25654
+4465%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2012 25 October 2016
Physical cores 2 22
Threads 2 44
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 145 Watt

Celeron 867 has 752.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2699A v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1000% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 867 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2699A v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 867 and Xeon E5-2699A v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 867
Celeron 867
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
Xeon E5-2699A v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron 867 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 43 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2699A v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 867 or Xeon E5-2699A v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.