Embedded G-Series T56N vs Celeron 847

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3115not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Embedded G-Series
Power efficiency1.67no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Bobcat
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.65 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz1.82 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1116.5
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size131 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million451 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCBGA1023no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s10.67 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 6320
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.34 0.38
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron 847 has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

Embedded G-Series T56N, on the other hand, has 11.8% faster integrated GPU.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Embedded G-Series T56N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
AMD Embedded G-Series T56N
Embedded G-Series T56N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 391 vote

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Embedded G-Series T56N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847 or Embedded G-Series T56N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.