Duron 1400 vs Celeron 847
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 847 and Duron 1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Duron |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | K7 (2000−2004) |
Release date | 19 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 15 August 2003 (21 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 847 and Duron 1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | FSB |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 266.66 MT/s |
Multiplier | 11 | 10.5 |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 64 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | 80.89 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | 37 Million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 847 and Duron 1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FCBGA1023 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Duron 1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
FMA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 847 and Duron 1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Duron 1400 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Duron 1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Duron 1400 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Duron 1400.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 19 June 2011 | 15 August 2003 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 57 Watt |
Celeron 847 has an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 235.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 847 and Duron 1400. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 847 is a notebook processor while Duron 1400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Duron 1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.