Celeron N3350E vs 847

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3098not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.67no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads22
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier11no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023no data
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Smart Idleno data-

Security technologies

Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size16 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 800 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency800 MHz650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
MIPI-DSIno data+
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes166

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.34 0.77
Recency 19 June 2011 1 July 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N3350E has 126.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 183.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Celeron N3350E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 847
Celeron 847
Intel Celeron N3350E
Celeron N3350E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 384 votes

Rate Celeron 847 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Celeron N3350E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 847 or Celeron N3350E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.