Atom E620 vs Celeron 847
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 847 and Atom E620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Tunnel Creek (2010) |
Release date | 19 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 14 September 2010 (14 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 847 and Atom E620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 0.6 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 11 | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | 26 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 million | 47 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 847 and Atom E620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1023 | Intel BGA 676 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 847 and Atom E620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
FMA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 847 and Atom E620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 847 and Atom E620 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 847 and Atom E620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | Intel GMA 600 |
Graphics max frequency | 800 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 847 and Atom E620 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 847 and Atom E620.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 19 June 2011 | 14 September 2010 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 3 Watt |
Celeron 847 has an age advantage of 9 months, 100% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom E620, on the other hand, has 466.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 847 and Atom E620. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 847 and Atom E620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.