Xeon Platinum 8175 vs Celeron 827
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Celeron | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 48 |
Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 14 | 25 |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 1.5 MB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 24 MB |
L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 33 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 504 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | no data | Socket P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-2666 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 768 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | 128.001 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 24 |
Threads | 1 | 48 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Xeon Platinum 8175 has 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 827 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8175 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 827 and Xeon Platinum 8175, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.