Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Celeron 807UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 10 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 Million | 9900 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | no data | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.662 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | AMD Radeon 610M |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron 807UE has 450% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7840HX, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 807UE and Ryzen 9 7840HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
