Xeon 6979P vs Celeron 787

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release date1 July 2011 (13 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)120
Threads1240
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier13no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)504 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA10237529
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency950 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1696

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2011 24 September 2024
Physical cores 1 120
Threads 1 240
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 500 Watt

Celeron 787 has 2841.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6979P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 11900% more physical cores and 23900% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 787 is a notebook processor while Xeon 6979P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 787 and Xeon 6979P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 787
Celeron 787
Intel Xeon 6979P
Xeon 6979P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 787 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7 votes

Rate Xeon 6979P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 787 or Xeon 6979P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.