EPYC 4564P vs Celeron 7305

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 7305
2022
5 cores / 5 threads, 15 Watt
1.56
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.68
+2444%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Celeron 7305 by a whopping 2444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking212466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.30
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency9.8422.09
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-U (2022)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date23 February 2022 (2 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores5 (Penta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Performance-cores1no data
Efficient-cores4no data
Threads532
Base clock speedno data4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1744AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267DDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2304 @ 60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096 x 2304 @ 120Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680 x 4320 @ 60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2028

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 7305 1.56
EPYC 4564P 39.68
+2444%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 7305 2471
EPYC 4564P 63036
+2451%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.56 39.68
Integrated graphics card 5.59 1.98
Recency 23 February 2022 21 May 2024
Physical cores 5 16
Threads 5 32
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 170 Watt

Celeron 7305 has 182.3% faster integrated GPU, and 1033.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 2443.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 220% more physical cores and 540% more threads.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 7305 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 7305 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 7305 and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 7305
Celeron 7305
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 143 votes

Rate Celeron 7305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 7305 or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.