Xeon w7-3555 vs Celeron 667
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Timna | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 24 August 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,339 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.67 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 75 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 129 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 370S | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 325 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel i752 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 112 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 28 |
| Threads | 1 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 325 Watt |
Celeron 667 has 983.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 667 is a desktop processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 667 and Xeon w7-3555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
