Processor N50 vs Celeron 6305

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.31
Processor N50
2023
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.75
+33.6%

Processor N50 outperforms Celeron 6305 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22602024
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency8.2627.60
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache160 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Processor N50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Processor N50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) ( - 750 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data
Execution Units48no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Processor N50 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Processor N50.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.31
Processor N50 1.75
+33.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Celeron 6305 1198
Processor N50 1339
+11.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 1.75
Integrated graphics card 5.58 2.29
Recency 1 September 2020 3 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron 6305 has 143.7% faster integrated GPU.

Processor N50, on the other hand, has a 33.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Processor N50 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 6305 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Processor N50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
Intel Processor N50
Processor N50

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 147 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Processor N50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Processor N50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.