Celeron N4000C vs 6305

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 6305
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.31
+47.2%
Celeron N4000C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.89

Celeron 6305 outperforms Celeron N4000C by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22602545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency8.2614.04
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020)no data
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)1 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cache160 KBno data
L2 cache2.5 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB4 MB
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin14 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 deg C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1449FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shift+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGX-Yes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4/LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz650 MHz
Execution Units4812

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported43
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 6305 1.31
+47.2%
Celeron N4000C 0.89

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 6305 2080
+47.9%
Celeron N4000C 1406

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.31 0.89
Recency 1 September 2020 1 April 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron 6305 has a 47.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron N4000C, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 6305 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N4000C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6305 and Celeron N4000C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 6305
Celeron 6305
Intel Celeron N4000C
Celeron N4000C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 147 votes

Rate Celeron 6305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 36 votes

Rate Celeron N4000C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 6305 or Celeron N4000C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.