K6-2+ 475ACZ vs Celeron 600
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 600 and K6-2+ 475ACZ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3396 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD K6-2+ |
| Power efficiency | 0.29 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Timna | Sharptooth (2000) |
| Release date | no data | 18 April 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $98 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 600 and K6-2+ 475ACZ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 0.48 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 100 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 4.75 |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 129 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 21 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 600 and K6-2+ 475ACZ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 370S | AMD Super Socket 7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 13 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 600 and K6-2+ 475ACZ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | unknown Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel i752 | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 13 Watt |
K6-2+ 475ACZ has 130.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 600 and K6-2+ 475ACZ. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 600 is a desktop processor while K6-2+ 475ACZ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 600 and K6-2+ 475ACZ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
