Ryzen 5 7600X3D vs Celeron 560

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 560
2008
31 Watt
0.21
Ryzen 5 7600X3D
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
16.29
+7657%

Ryzen 5 7600X3D outperforms Celeron 560 by a whopping 7657% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3211410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.71
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.6423.70
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)30 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed2.13 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache96 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data11,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478AM5
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 560 0.21
Ryzen 5 7600X3D 16.29
+7657%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 560 339
Ryzen 5 7600X3D 25882
+7535%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 16.29
Recency 1 January 2008 30 August 2024
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 560 has 109.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 7600X3D, on the other hand, has a 7657.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 7600X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 560 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 7600X3D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 560 and Ryzen 5 7600X3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 560
Celeron 560
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D
Ryzen 5 7600X3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 15 votes

Rate Celeron 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 54 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7600X3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 560 or Ryzen 5 7600X3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.