Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Celeron 560

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 560
2008
31 Watt
0.21
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 81 Watt
0.22
+4.8%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ outperforms Celeron 560 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32113194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency0.640.26
Architecture codenameno dataClawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Base clock speed2.13 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478754
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt81 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 560 0.21
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 0.22
+4.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 560 339
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 356
+5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.22
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 81 Watt

Celeron 560 has 161.3% lower power consumption.

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, on the other hand, has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 560 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 560
Celeron 560
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 15 votes

Rate Celeron 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 560 or Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.