Celeron E1200 vs 540

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 540
2007
30 Watt
0.19
Celeron E1200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.32
+68.4%

Celeron E1200 outperforms Celeron 540 by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32473094
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.600.47
Architecture codenameno dataAllendale (2006−2009)
Release date1 July 2007 (17 years ago)January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$40

Detailed specifications

Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.86 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (shared)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data77 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 540 0.19
Celeron E1200 0.32
+68.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 540 305
Celeron E1200 516
+69.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 540 180
Celeron E1200 196
+8.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 540 178
Celeron E1200 343
+92.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.32
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 540 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron E1200, on the other hand, has a 68.4% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron E1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 540 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 540 is a notebook processor while Celeron E1200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 540 and Celeron E1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 540
Celeron 540
Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 16 votes

Rate Celeron 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 540 or Celeron E1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.