Athlon Neo X2 L335 vs Celeron 540

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 540
2007
30 Watt
0.19
Athlon Neo X2 L335
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.33
+73.7%

Athlon Neo X2 L335 outperforms Celeron 540 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32433083
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno data2x AMD Athlon Neo
Power efficiency0.601.73
Architecture codenameno dataCongo (2009)
Release date1 July 2007 (17 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.95V-1.3Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478ASB1 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 540 0.19
Athlon Neo X2 L335 0.33
+73.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 540 305
Athlon Neo X2 L335 529
+73.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.19 0.33
Recency 1 July 2007 1 October 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 18 Watt

Athlon Neo X2 L335 has a 73.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Neo X2 L335 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 540 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 540 and Athlon Neo X2 L335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 540
Celeron 540
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 16 votes

Rate Celeron 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 540 or Athlon Neo X2 L335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.