Athlon Gold PRO 3150G vs Celeron 540
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1233 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.06 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Dali (2020) |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.95V-1.3V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 21 July 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron 540 has 116.7% lower power consumption.
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 540 is a notebook processor while Athlon Gold PRO 3150G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 540 and Athlon Gold PRO 3150G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
