Processor N97 vs Celeron 5305U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 5305U and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiencyno data27.51
Architecture codenameno dataAlder Lake-N (2023)
Release date1 April 2020 (4 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 5305U and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data10 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 5305U and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 5305U and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 5305U and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 5305U and Processor N97 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 5305U and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 5305U and Processor N97.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2020 3 January 2023
Threads 2 4
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

Processor N97 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 5305U and Processor N97. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 5305U and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 5305U
Celeron 5305U
Intel Processor N97
Processor N97

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 5305U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 202 votes

Rate Processor N97 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 5305U or Processor N97, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.