Celeron 6305 vs 5205U
Aggregate performance score
6305 outperforms 5205U by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 5205U and Celeron 6305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2462 | 2187 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Comet Lake | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) | Tiger Lake-U |
| Release date | 31 October 2019 (4 years ago) | 1 September 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 5205U and Celeron 6305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 5205U and Celeron 6305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | BGA1528 | BGA1449 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 5205U and Celeron 6305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 5205U and Celeron 6305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 5205U and Celeron 6305.
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.93 | 1.35 |
| Integrated graphics card | 1.35 | 4.55 |
| Recency | 31 October 2019 | 1 September 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Celeron 6305 has a 45.2% higher aggregate performance score, 237% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 months, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron 6305 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 5205U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 5205U and Celeron 6305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
