Ryzen 5 3550H vs Celeron 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data13.21
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm12 nm
Die size77 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °C105 °C
Number of transistors105 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 430 280
Ryzen 5 3550H 7766
+2674%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 430 155
Ryzen 5 3550H 940
+506%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 430 160
Ryzen 5 3550H 2857
+1686%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm

Ryzen 5 3550H has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 430 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 3550H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Ryzen 5 3550H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
Ryzen 5 3550H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 141 vote

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2790 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3550H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 430 or Ryzen 5 3550H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.