Xeon W-3345 vs Celeron 420

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiencyno data10.89
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)29 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads148
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm10 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °C81 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345.

PCIe versionno data4
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 420 235
Xeon W-3345 45694
+19344%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 24
Threads 1 48
Chip lithography 65 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

Celeron 420 has 614.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3345, on the other hand, has 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 550% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 420 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3345 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and Xeon W-3345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
Intel Xeon W-3345
Xeon W-3345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 169 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W-3345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 420 or Xeon W-3345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.