FX-6120 vs Celeron 420

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 420 and FX-6120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data2.44
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 420 and FX-6120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads16
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB288 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size77 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 420 and FX-6120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and FX-6120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 420 and FX-6120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and FX-6120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and FX-6120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 420 and FX-6120.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 420 235
FX-6120 3899
+1559%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 6
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron 420 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

FX-6120, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 420 and FX-6120. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and FX-6120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
AMD FX-6120
FX-6120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 169 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 35 votes

Rate FX-6120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 420 or FX-6120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.