EPYC 4464P vs Celeron 3965Y

Place in the ranking	2663	134
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	69.94
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	11.77	27.38
Architecture codename	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date	21 April 2017 (7 years ago)	21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads	2	24
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.3 GHz	5.4 GHz
Bus type	OPI	no data
Bus rate	4 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	13	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Die size	no data	2x 71 mm²
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	61 °C
Number of transistors	no data	13,140 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	1
Socket	FCBGA1515	AM5
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
My WiFi	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Smart Response	+	no data
Precision Boost 2	no data	+

Security technologies

Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
MPX	+	-
SGX	Yes with Intel® ME	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	16 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	34.134 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 615	AMD Radeon Graphics
Max video memory	16 GB	no data
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video	+	no data
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	850 MHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
DVI	+	no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support	+	no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4	4096x2304@24Hz	no data
Max resolution over eDP	4096x2304@60Hz	no data
Max resolution over DisplayPort	4096x2304@60Hz	no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	12	no data
OpenGL	4.4	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	16	28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3965Y 0.75

EPYC 4464P 30.54
+3972%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3965Y 1194

EPYC 4464P 48518
+3963%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.75	30.54
Integrated graphics card	1.87	1.98
Recency	21 April 2017	21 May 2024
Physical cores	2	12
Threads	2	24
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	105 Watt

Celeron 3965Y has 1650% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has a 3972% higher aggregate performance score, 5.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4464P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3965Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3965Y is a notebook processor while EPYC 4464P is a server/workstation one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3965Y and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.