N100 vs Celeron 3765U
Aggregate performance score
N100 outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 3765U and N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2528 | 1470 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | no data |
Release date | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 3765U and N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
Die size | 82 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1300 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 3765U and N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | BGA | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | no data |
AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and N100 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and N100.
PCI Express lanes | 12 | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
N100 outperforms Celeron 3765U by 341% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
N100 outperforms Celeron 3765U by 340% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.81 | 3.57 |
Recency | 1 June 2015 | 1 January 2023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
N100 has a 340.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 150% lower power consumption.
The N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.