EPYC 4244P vs Celeron 3765U
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 4244P outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 2108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2613 | 361 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 53.02 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.95 | 25.23 |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Raphael (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 1 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $229 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1300 Million | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| OS Guard | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processors | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 850 MHz | no data |
| InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 11.2/12 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 28 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.80 | 17.66 |
| Recency | 1 June 2015 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron 3765U has 333.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4244P, on the other hand, has a 2107.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The EPYC 4244P is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 3765U is a notebook processor while EPYC 4244P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
