Athlon XP-M 2600+ vs Celeron 3765U

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2609not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon XP-M
Power efficiency4.98no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate5 GT/s333 MT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die size82 mm2101 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million54 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168A
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GB4 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 3765U has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3765U and Athlon XP-M 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U
AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+
Athlon XP-M 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Athlon XP-M 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3765U or Athlon XP-M 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.