EPYC 7443 vs Celeron 3755U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3755U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.74
EPYC 7443
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
35.63
+4715%

EPYC 7443 outperforms Celeron 3755U by a whopping 4715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2658104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.25
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.6716.86
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$2,010

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.85 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier1728.5
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size82 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1168SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3755U 0.74
EPYC 7443 35.63
+4715%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3755U 1182
EPYC 7443 56601
+4689%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 35.63
Recency 1 March 2015 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron 3755U has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7443, on the other hand, has a 4714.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7443 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3755U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 3755U is a notebook processor while EPYC 7443 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3755U and EPYC 7443, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3755U
Celeron 3755U
AMD EPYC 7443
EPYC 7443

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 3755U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7443 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3755U or EPYC 7443, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.