Celeron B800 vs 3755U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2650not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.68no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)19 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$80

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1715
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size82 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency800 MHz1 GHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3755U 1182
+79.9%
Celeron B800 657

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2015 19 June 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 3755U has an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3755U and Celeron B800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3755U
Celeron 3755U
Intel Celeron B800
Celeron B800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 3755U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 186 votes

Rate Celeron B800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3755U or Celeron B800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.