Pentium T4400 vs Celeron 3215U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3215U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.71
+39.2%

Celeron 3215U outperforms Pentium T4400 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27182885
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency4.321.33
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)no data
Release date1 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHzno data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache2 MB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1300 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1168PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3215U 0.71
+39.2%
Pentium T4400 0.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3215U 1083
+40.1%
Pentium T4400 773

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 3215U 331
+32.4%
Pentium T4400 250

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 3215U 587
+46.4%
Pentium T4400 401

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.51
Recency 1 June 2015 1 October 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 3215U has a 39.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 3215U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium T4400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3215U and Pentium T4400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3215U
Celeron 3215U
Intel Pentium T4400
Pentium T4400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate Celeron 3215U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 28 votes

Rate Pentium T4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3215U or Pentium T4400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.