Turion 64 ML-30 vs Celeron 2980U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-4005U Core i3-4030U Core i5-4200M Core i5-4200U Core i5-4210U Core i7-4510U Core i7-4700MQ
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-32 Turion 64 ML-34 Turion 64 ML-37 Turion 64 ML-40 Turion 64 ML-42 Turion 64 ML-44 Turion 64 MT-28 Turion 64 MT-30 Turion 64 MT-32 Turion 64 MT-34 Turion 64 MT-37 Turion 64 MT-40

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 2980U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.66
+313%
Turion 64 ML-30
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.16

Celeron 2980U outperforms Turion 64 ML-30 by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27543291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronTurion 64
Power efficiency4.160.43
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)March 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size118 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168754
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.66 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 2980U has a 312.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 2980U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-30 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2980U and Turion 64 ML-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron 2980U
Celeron 2980U
AMD Turion 64 ML-30
Turion 64 ML-30
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
vs
Phenom II X3 P820 Phenom II X3 P820
Turion 64 ML-30 Turion 64 ML-30
vs
Turion 64 ML-28 Turion 64 ML-28
Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
vs
Celeron N2940 Celeron N2940
A6-7000 A6 7000
vs
Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
vs
E-300 E 300
Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
vs
A4-1200 A4 1200
Phenom II X3 P820 Phenom II X3 P820
vs
Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
vs
Turion 64 MK-36 Turion 64 MK-36
A4-9120 A4 9120
vs
Celeron 2980U Celeron 2980U
Xeon E3-1575M v5 Xeon E3 1575M v5
vs
A8-3520M A8 3520M
i7-4960HQ Core i7 4960HQ
vs
A8-3520M A8 3520M
i7-2760QM Core i7 2760QM
vs
A8-3520M A8 3520M
A8-3520M A8 3520M
vs
Pentium N3700 Pentium N3700

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 2980U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2980U or Turion 64 ML-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.