Atom x5-Z8330 vs Celeron 2961Y

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2866
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Airmont (2016)
Release date1 December 2013 (10 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed1.1 GHz1.92 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168no data
Power consumption (TDP)11.5 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5no data
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio+no data
RST+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-RS 1600
Maximum memory size16 GB2 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHz500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes121
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.03.0
Total number of SATA ports4no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports4no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2961Y 684
Atom x5-Z8330 809
+18.3%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2013 8 February 2016
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm

Atom x5-Z8330 has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2961Y and Atom x5-Z8330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2961Y
Celeron 2961Y
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Atom x5-Z8330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron 2961Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 9 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2961Y or Atom x5-Z8330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.