Atom D2500 vs Celeron 2957U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2839not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.41no data
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date1 January 2014 (10 years ago)1 November 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.4 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1168FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Response-no data
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
GPIO+no data
Smart Connect+no data
FDI-no data
AMT9.5-
Matrix Storage-no data
HD Audio++
RST+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GB4 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel GMA
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes104
PCI support-no data
USB revision3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports22
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Integrated IDE-no data
Number of USB ports48
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2957U 855
+255%
Atom D2500 241

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2014 1 November 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron 2957U has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D2500, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2957U and Atom D2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2957U
Celeron 2957U
Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 70 votes

Rate Celeron 2957U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 36 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2957U or Atom D2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.