A6-9210 vs Celeron 2950M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 2950M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 37 Watt
0.80

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2950M and A6-9210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25942597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2950M and A6-9210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size130 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors960 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2950M and A6-9210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA946FP4
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt10-15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2950M and A6-9210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 2950M and A6-9210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2950M and A6-9210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2950M and A6-9210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon R4 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2950M and A6-9210 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
VGA+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 2950M and A6-9210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2950M and A6-9210.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes168

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2950M 0.80
A6-9210 0.80

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2950M 1234
+0.3%
A6-9210 1230

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2013 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron 2950M has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9210, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 270% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 2950M and A6-9210.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2950M and A6-9210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2950M
Celeron 2950M
AMD A6-9210
A6-9210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Celeron 2950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2950M or A6-9210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.