Atom E625CT vs Celeron 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3328not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency0.65no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Stellarton (2010)
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)22 November 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz0.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size77 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479Intel BGA1466
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 600

Pros & cons summary


Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 3 Watt

Atom E625CT has 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and Atom E625CT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
Intel Atom E625CT
Atom E625CT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 59 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E625CT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 220 or Atom E625CT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.