i7-1255U vs Celeron 2.10

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated884
Place by popularitynot in top-10037
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-M
Power efficiencyno data53.88
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release dateNovember 2002 (22 years ago)23 February 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache8 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache128 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size146 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors55 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket478FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2.10 244
i7-1255U 13563
+5459%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 12
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 15 Watt

i7-1255U has 900% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and 386.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 2.10 is a desktop processor while Core i7-1255U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.10 and Core i7-1255U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2.10
Celeron 2.10
Intel Core i7-1255U
Core i7-1255U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 2.10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 799 votes

Rate Core i7-1255U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2.10 or Core i7-1255U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.