EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Celeron 1020M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2616not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.16no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads296
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm5 nm
Die size118 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °C75 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988SP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes1696

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2013 1 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 2 96
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron 1020M has 471.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 2300% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 1020M is a notebook processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020M and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1020M
Celeron 1020M
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Celeron 1020M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1020M or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.