Athlon 1300 vs Celeron 1020M
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2596 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 2.18 | no data |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Thunderbird B (2000−2001) |
Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 21 March 2001 (23 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $318 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | 118 mm2 | 120 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 37 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCPGA988 | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 68 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
FDI | + | no data |
Fast Memory Access | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
SDVO | + | no data |
CRT | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 20 January 2013 | 21 March 2001 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 68 Watt |
Celeron 1020M has an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 718.2% more advanced lithography process, and 94.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 1020M is a notebook processor while Athlon 1300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020M and Athlon 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.