Athlon II M340 vs Celeron 1019Y

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2871
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Athlon II
Power efficiencyno data1.38
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Caspian (2009)
Release date1 April 2013 (11 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$153no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s3200 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA1023Socket S1 (S1g3)
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1019Y 576
Athlon II M340 807
+40.1%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2013 10 September 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 1019Y has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1019Y and Athlon II M340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1019Y
Celeron 1019Y
AMD Athlon II M340
Athlon II M340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 1019Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Athlon II M340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1019Y or Athlon II M340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.