Xeon w7-3555 vs Celeron 1007U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.95no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$2,339

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data28
Threads256
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)75 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size118 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °C78 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt325 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2013 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 28
Threads 2 56
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 325 Watt

Celeron 1007U has 1811.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon w7-3555, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 1007U is a notebook processor while Xeon w7-3555 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Xeon w7-3555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U
Intel Xeon w7-3555
Xeon w7-3555

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 126 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon w7-3555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1007U or Xeon w7-3555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.