Ultra 9 288V vs Celeron 1007U

Place in the ranking	2850	618
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	2.95	38.82
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)	24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	5.1 GHz
Bus type	DMI	no data
Bus rate	5 GT/s	37 MHz
Multiplier	15	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	192 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	3 nm
Die size	118 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCBGA1023	Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors	Arc 140V
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	16	4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1007U 0.54

Ultra 9 288V 12.54
+2222%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1007U 839

Ultra 9 288V 19542
+2229%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron 1007U 1610

Ultra 9 288V 12505
+677%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Celeron 1007U 1

Ultra 9 288V 20
+1536%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Celeron 1007U 0.63

Ultra 9 288V 3.56
+465%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	12.54
Recency	20 January 2013	24 September 2024
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	22 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	30 Watt

Celeron 1007U has 76.5% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has a 2222.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1007U in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.