Celeron G4900 vs 1007U

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2872	2160
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	2.95
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	2.97	2.78
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)	3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.5 GHz	3.1 GHz
Bus type	DMI	DMI 3.0
Bus rate	5 GT/s	4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier	15	31
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Die size	118 mm2	126 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	72 °C
Number of transistors	1,400 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1 (Uniprocessor)
Socket	FCBGA1023	1151
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size	32 GB	64 GB
Max memory channels	2	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support	-	+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors	Intel UHD Graphics 610
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.53	1.49
Integrated graphics card	0.77	1.89
Recency	20 January 2013	3 April 2018
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	51 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---