Ryzen 7 7435HS vs Celeron 1005M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Ryzen 7 7435HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
15.08
+2054%

Ryzen 7 7435HS outperforms Celeron 1005M by a whopping 2054% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2712466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronRyzen 7000 Series
Power efficiency1.8931.71
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Rembrandt R
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache2 MB16 MB
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size94 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2USB 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsN/A
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70
Ryzen 7 7435HS 15.08
+2054%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1109
Ryzen 7 7435HS 23949
+2060%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 15.08
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron 1005M has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7435HS, on the other hand, has a 2054.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7435HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Ryzen 7 7435HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS
Ryzen 7 7435HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 254 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 576 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7435HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Ryzen 7 7435HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.