E1-6010 vs Celeron 1005M
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1005M and E1-6010 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2604 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD E-Series |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Beema (2014) |
| Release date | 1 July 2013 (11 years ago) | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1005M and E1-6010 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 1.35 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1005M and E1-6010 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | rPGA988B | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and E1-6010. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 1005M and E1-6010 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and E1-6010. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and E1-6010.
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron 1005M outperforms E1-6010 by 107% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron 1005M outperforms E1-6010 by 160% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Celeron 1005M outperforms E1-6010 by 155% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| Recency | 1 July 2013 | 29 April 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Celeron 1005M has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.
E1-6010, on the other hand, has 3.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 months, and 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 1005M and E1-6010. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and E1-6010, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
