i3-330M vs Celeron 1005M

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
+9.4%
Core i3-330M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.64

Celeron 1005M outperforms Core i3-330M by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27042752
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Core i3
Power efficiency1.891.73
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$49

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz0.13 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA
Number of transistorsno data382 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCPGA988BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70
+9.4%
i3-330M 0.64

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1108
+8.4%
i3-330M 1022

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1005M 326
+19.9%
i3-330M 272

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1005M 562
i3-330M 566
+0.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.64
Recency 1 July 2013 7 January 2010
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm

Celeron 1005M has a 9.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

i3-330M, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Core i3-330M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Core i3-330M
Core i3-330M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 251 vote

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 298 votes

Rate Core i3-330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Core i3-330M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.