i3-10100 vs Celeron 1005M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Core i3-10100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.45
+679%

Core i3-10100 outperforms Celeron 1005M by a whopping 679% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27041154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.75
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.897.93
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Comet Lake-S (2020)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$130

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s8 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video-+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.1 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70
i3-10100 5.45
+679%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1108
i3-10100 8655
+681%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1005M 326
i3-10100 1436
+340%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1005M 563
i3-10100 4234
+652%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 5.45
Recency 1 July 2013 30 April 2020
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 1005M has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i3-10100, on the other hand, has a 678.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-10100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1005M is a notebook processor while Core i3-10100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Core i3-10100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Core i3-10100
Core i3-10100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2947 votes

Rate Core i3-10100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Core i3-10100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.